CatalystOne
vs
Veda HR Cloud
CatalystOne
Veda HR Cloud
Company size
Number of employees
Microbusinesses (1-10)
Small businesses (11-100)
Medium-sized businesses (101-500)
Large companies (500+)
Microbusinesses (1-10)
Small businesses (11-100)
Medium-sized businesses (101-500)
Large companies (500+)
Platform
Cloud service
Mobile app
Cloud service
Mobile app
Price information
Free trial
Module pricing
Subscription pricing
Licence pricing
Free trial
Module pricing
Subscription pricing
Licence pricing
Product features in HR Software
360-degree feedback
Absence recording
Approval
Benefits management
Bonus & incentives
Career planning
Case management
Compensation management
Consultation
Core HR
Digitising personnel files
Electronic signature
Exit surveys
Has its own payroll system
HR analytics
Learning management
Onboarding
Performance management
Performance reviews
Recruitment
Reports & KPIs
Salary review
Self-service
Single sign-on (SSO)
Skills development
Time reporting
Training package
User rights management
Workflow automation
360-degree feedback
Absence recording
Approval
Benefits management
Bonus & incentives
Career planning
Case management
Compensation management
Consultation
Core HR
Digitising personnel files
Electronic signature
Exit surveys
Has its own payroll system
HR analytics
Learning management
Onboarding
Performance management
Performance reviews
Recruitment
Reports & KPIs
Salary review
Self-service
Single sign-on (SSO)
Skills development
Time reporting
Training package
User rights management
Workflow automation
Reviews
Based on 10 reviews
Based on 1 reviews
Ease of use
4.3
Collaboration with the supplier
4.9
Support and service
4.8
Range of features
4.2
Customisation and flexibility
3.6
Integration
4.4
Value for money
4.3
How satisfied are you overall?
4.6
Ease of use
4.0
Collaboration with the supplier
5.0
Support and service
5.0
Range of features
4.0
Customisation and flexibility
4.0
Integration
4.0
Value for money
4.0
How satisfied are you overall?
4.0
Reviews
Pros
CatalystOne gives you great freedom to make changes yourself, making it possible to customise HR processes to your own needs. It offers fast support and a community platform where you can find information and inspiration for what you want to create or develop in the system.
CatalystOne has recently given their interface a facelift, bringing the design into the 21st century. This reflects a broader effort over the past year to significantly strengthen product development—not only in terms of aesthetics, but also functionality. We highly value this continuous development.
In addition, their support team is very responsive, with most requests either resolved or at least initiated within 1–2 working days. This level of service is greatly appreciated.
In my view, VEDA offers a very wide range of HR solutions from a single source. I particularly appreciate the self-service functions for staff and managers, as they simplify many administrative tasks and take the pressure off us in HR. The integration of d.vinci and peopleIX within recruitment and analytics is another plus point for me, as it ensures processes are better interlinked. Features such as personnel cost planning also support structured and transparent workforce planning. The personnel file allows employees to access their documents at any time.
Reviews
Cons
As a larger organisation, you may find that CatalystOne in some cases appears to have been originally developed with smaller companies in mind. Several modules are tied to certain standard roles that don't always match the needs of a larger organisation.
In addition, there are limited opportunities to work with "if" logic in workflows for onboarding, internal changes and offboarding. Overall, the workflow functionality has significant development potential - even though it works satisfactorily today.
Some functionalities and modules are not fully optimized. For example, the absence module is not particularly well suited for the Danish market, which can create occasional challenges for us.
Similarly, the Salary Review module lacks flexibility for companies with commercial bonus structures, limiting its usability in that area.
I see particular potential in the interfaces and data exchange between the various solutions. Even more streamlined integrations would be desirable here. The time and attendance module is also slightly over-engineered for our needs (as we do not have shifts, etc.), although the functions we use operate stably and reliably.
