CINODE
vs
SugarCRM

Overview

What type of system is CINODE?

Cinode is resource management software built for consulting firms, combining resource planning with skills management, CVs and a consulting CRM. It belongs in the same category as Agileday, Flowcase and RecMan. Flowcase focuses on CVs and proposals, Agileday on resource and skills planning, and RecMan on staffing agencies. Cinode connects sales pipeline, skills and staffing in one system, with AI agents and MCP.

What type of system is SugarCRM?

Sorry, no data yet.

Who uses CINODE?

Cinode is used by sales managers, account managers, consultant managers, CEOs and CFOs, while consultants keep their own profiles updated. Typical customers are consulting firms with 50 to 5,000 employees in IT consulting, engineering consulting and management consulting. Nearly 300 consulting firms use Cinode, including HiQ, XLENT, Rejlers, Knowit and Nitor.

Who uses SugarCRM?

Sorry, no data yet.

Company size

Number of employees

Microbusinesses (1-10)
Small businesses (11-100)
Medium-sized businesses (101-500)
Large companies (500+)
Microbusinesses (1-10)
Small businesses (11-100)
Medium-sized businesses (101-500)
Large companies (500+)

Platform

Cloud service
On-premises
Mobile app
Cloud service
On-premises
Mobile app

Price information

Free trial
Free plan
Price from

From 60€

Module pricing
Subscription pricing
Licence pricing
Free trial
Free plan
Price from

-

Module pricing
Subscription pricing
Licence pricing

Product features in CRM Software

API integration
Built-in reminders
Calendar and activity integration
Call directly from CRM (click-to-call)
Call lists
Contact/prospect management
Create documents & contracts
E-signature and contract management
Education
Email marketing module
Integrated and digitised sales processes
Lead generation via the web
Lead scoring
Lead tracking
Pipeline management
Quote configurator/CPQ
Reporting and real-time sales forecasts
Resellers
Sales dashboards and KPI tracking
Send newsletter from CRM
Social CRM (social media integration)
API integration
Built-in reminders
Calendar and activity integration
Call directly from CRM (click-to-call)
Call lists
Contact/prospect management
Create documents & contracts
E-signature and contract management
Education
Email marketing module
Integrated and digitised sales processes
Lead generation via the web
Lead scoring
Lead tracking
Pipeline management
Quote configurator/CPQ
Reporting and real-time sales forecasts
Resellers

Exsitec

Sales dashboards and KPI tracking
Send newsletter from CRM
Social CRM (social media integration)

Reviews

Based on 5 reviews

Based on 13 reviews

Ease of use
4.0
Collaboration with the supplier
4.6
Support and service
4.6Highest
Range of features
4.6Highest
Customisation and flexibility
4.2
Integration
4.0Highest
Value for money
4.0
How satisfied are you overall?
4.4
Ease of use
4.6Highest
Collaboration with the supplier
4.8Highest
Support and service
4.1
Range of features
4.5
Customisation and flexibility
4.2
Integration
3.8
Value for money
4.6Highest
How satisfied are you overall?
4.7Highest

Reviews

Pros

The combination of skills, CRM and forecasting in a single tool
I like the fact that Cinode is a specialised CRM for consultancy firms. I also love that they’re quick to roll out new features, such as the MCP server. With its help, we’ve been able to automate large parts of our business.
The switch to Sugar Sell and even more so Sugar Serve has allowed us to completely change how we use our CRM. Now we have a database that we can pull reports from and allocate processes to. Serve with CJP and BPM allows a strategic process with automated steps that need to be followed in order to reach the next step. This means that important steps are not missed. For the user, it's streamlined and user-friendly too. Well done!
Easy to use. Navigating is super easy. The user interface is nice. The support is great. I like their Dashboard.

Reviews

Cons

That it is a bit tricky to make forecasts on a financial year basis
Guit can involve quite a few clicks. But you get the hang of it.
The dynamic reports need more options for graphs. I also miss detailed year-to-year reports.
Some plugins don't work very well. Especially third-party plugins. The cost to get started is quite high. It's not very customisable, but on the other hand, there are a lot of features. Sometimes it can lag a bit and take time to load. The support is slow sometimes, but they still try to solve the problems.