Huma
vs
GoalEnvision

Huma

GoalEnvision
Company size
Number of employees
Microenterprises (1-10)
Small business (11-100)
Medium-sized enterprises (101-500)
Large companies (500+)
Microenterprises (1-10)
Small business (11-100)
Medium-sized enterprises (101-500)
Large companies (500+)
Platform
Cloud service
Mobile app
Cloud service
Mobile app
Price information
Free trial
Price model module
Subscription price model
Price model license
Free trial
Price model module
Subscription price model
Price model license
Product features in Performance Management Software
360 degree feedback
Continuous employee reviews
Development plans
OKRs
Performance evaluations
Personal profiles
Reports
Skills mapping
360 degree feedback
Continuous employee reviews
Development plans
OKRs
Performance evaluations
Personal profiles
Reports
Skills mapping
Reviews
Based on 44 reviews
Based on 1 reviews
Ease of use
Cooperation with the supplier
Support and service
Range of functions
Customisation and flexibility
Integration
Value for money
How satisfied are you overall?
Ease of use
Cooperation with the supplier
Support and service
Range of functions
Customisation and flexibility
Integration
Value for money
How satisfied are you overall?
Reviews
Pros
That the system is very user-friendly, easy to update and maintain. It also gathers all HR related information in one place where it is easy to find.
Contracts, appraisals, onboarding and everything in one place.
Goalenvision's methodology, the automated reporting tool, the possibility to create surveys or targets for employees or success units
Reviews
Cons
"The system works well for our use, but could perhaps be more vibrant where you can have a dialogue with each other. We haven't been able to test all the functions yet, but we realise that we still need the intranet page we have on Facebook.
For those who have several manuals, they come one after another. I wish this was more clear with the fact that you choose which manual you want to print into.
The tool's graphs and the clarity of what they show could still be simplified.