HR-ON
vs
Digital Recruiters
HR-ON
Digital Recruiters
Company size
Number of employees
Microbusinesses (1-10)
Small businesses (11-100)
Medium-sized businesses (101-500)
Large companies (500+)
Microbusinesses (1-10)
Small businesses (11-100)
Medium-sized businesses (101-500)
Large companies (500+)
Platform
Cloud service
Mobile app
Cloud service
Mobile app
Price information
Free trial
Module pricing
Subscription pricing
Licence pricing
Free trial
Module pricing
Subscription pricing
Licence pricing
Product features in Recruiting Software
Access levels
AI support in recruitment
API integration
Campaign module/landing page
Candidate tests
Career page and employer branding tools
GDPR-compliant
Interview scheduling
Onboarding
Scorecard (objective assessment)
Skills-based recruitment
Social media advertising
Sourcing (active candidate search)
Statistics & analysis
Tests & assessments
Triggers in the recruitment process
Access levels
AI support in recruitment
API integration
Campaign module/landing page
Candidate tests
Career page and employer branding tools
GDPR-compliant
Interview scheduling
Onboarding
Scorecard (objective assessment)
Skills-based recruitment
Social media advertising
Sourcing (active candidate search)
Statistics & analysis
Tests & assessments
Triggers in the recruitment process
Product features in Applicant Tracking Systems
Candidate chat
Careers site
Dashboard
Keywords and filtering
Measuring candidate experience
Reference management
Scorecard
Social media advertising
Statistics and analysis
Track job ads
Video recruitment
Candidate chat
Careers site
Dashboard
Keywords and filtering
Measuring candidate experience
Reference management
Scorecard
Social media advertising
Statistics and analysis
Track job ads
Video recruitment
Reviews
Based on 10 reviews
Based on 2 reviews
Ease of use
4.8
Support and service
4.8
Range of features
4.3
Customisation and flexibility
4.8
Value for money
4.9
How satisfied are you overall?
4.7
Collaboration with the supplier
5.0
Integration
4.6
Ease of use
5.0
Support and service
4.5
Range of features
5.0
Customisation and flexibility
5.0
Value for money
4.0
How satisfied are you overall?
5.0
Collaboration with the supplier
5.0
Integration
4.5
Reviews
Pros
I think HR-ON is the most intuitive and user-friendly HR system I’ve used in my many years in HR. It works really well with the videos that have been created to help set up the system and use it afterwards. The system’s wide range of features also provides a great opportunity for development as required.
I also really like the many options for customisation to suit the customer’s needs and the great flexibility in the set-up options.
The system meets a wide range of HR needs (recruitment, onboarding, staff management, time and absence tracking, performance reviews/annual appraisals, etc.). For us, absence tracking has been a huge benefit thanks to HR-ON.
The support team are very friendly and always helpful.
Thanks to the system, we can now manage all adverts within one team and also make it much more flexible than before.
I also like that a candidate applying to one of our subsidiaries can easily apply to all related companies at the same time if they find relevant positions elsewhere.
What I have really appreciated is the co-operation with Cegid. They have been committed to understanding our needs and setting up processes that suit us, which has been crucial to getting as much out of the system as we have.
Reviews
Cons
HR-ON has become a bit like other HR systems, where you need to purchase additional modules to get the full benefit of the system. And it lacks a ‘built-in calculator’ for holidays and absences, so it could be used a bit more flexibly and more widely across different sectors.
There are many different configuration options, which in many ways is a very good thing, as it allows you to tailor the system to your business’s needs. Sometimes, however, this can also be a drawback, as you may end up spending a lot of time trying to find exactly where a minor adjustment needs to be made.
It took some work to implement the system, but that's probably largely because we have complicated structures and needs. It turned out very well in the end regardless.
I can't think of anything right now
