webCRM
vs
Zoho One

The biggest drawback is that the system cannot generate statistics and reports across countries with automatic conversion to the same currency. This makes it difficult to compare performance across markets. In addition, we find that the built-in e-sign solution doesn't quite match our needs - so we are now integrating with Addo Sign, which gives us more options.

There are some features that take some getting used to, especially if you haven't worked with CRM systems before. But fortunately, webCRM compensates for this through good guides and easy access to support. Over time, this becomes an advantage because you can configure most things yourself without the need for external consultants.

The areas with which we are least satisfied relate primarily to the Zoho platform itself, rather than CRM Nordic. There are still a number of places where text and functions have not been translated into Danish, which results in a less seamless user experience – particularly when the system is also used directly by our Danish customers. We also find Zoho Bookings to be relatively limited. Here, we would like to see greater flexibility and the ability to create a more intuitive and user-friendly booking flow. Generally speaking, there are a few areas in Zoho where relatively simple requests require more customisation and development than one might initially expect.

An advanced, bespoke solution requires ongoing maintenance and further development as processes, products and internal requirements change. This means that new requirements sometimes need to be analysed and tested before they can be implemented. At the same time, flexibility is one of the solution’s greatest strengths, and Nordic CRM helps us to prioritise and implement the changes in a structured manner.